|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Jan 18, 2010 10:42:12 GMT
Your Aspie score: 69 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 123 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical  Quiz can be found here. |
|
|
|
Post by Glance A'Lot on Jan 18, 2010 11:24:47 GMT
Your Aspie score: 72 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 131 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical Now - is that good or bad?  |
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Jan 18, 2010 12:22:43 GMT
Wouldn't that depend on whether being diagnosed with some form of autism would be advantageous in your job?
|
|
|
|
Post by Glance A'Lot on Jan 18, 2010 13:24:39 GMT
In principle yes - unfortunately I'm not at all sure what this test diagnosed me with.
'Neurotypical' doesn't really tell me anything I can work with.
(That is of course due to my lack of knowledge in this field)
But don't bother too much - I live well with the result.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Jan 18, 2010 13:41:10 GMT
neurotypical means that you are within the bounds of normal psychological traits.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jan 18, 2010 13:49:42 GMT
 Demonstrating my multi-tasking while form filling, as I'm in one of the hardest parts of FF12... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Ubereil on Jan 18, 2010 17:12:07 GMT
"Do you believe that there is no absolute right or wrong?" Do they mean deontology vs consequentialism or moral absolutism vs moral relativism? They probably mean the first one based on consequentialism not being an absolute moral theory and in that case I'm very much in favor of relative right and wrong. But consequentialism is an absolute moral theory (even though what is right and wrong is relative to the situation in question), and I think moral relativism is rubbish. So depending on what they mean I'm either strongly for or strongly against. I hate ambiguity... I also hate double negations. "Do you not mind striving for the well being of others". Why not just ask if I mind striving for the well being of others? Oh well... My result: Your Aspie score: 71 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 129 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical  I wonder what they mean by "hunting"... Übereil |
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Jan 18, 2010 17:47:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Jan 18, 2010 18:06:30 GMT
 Your Aspie score: 136 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 89 of 200 You are very likely an Aspie |
|
|
|
Post by Ubereil on Jan 18, 2010 18:21:12 GMT
Cat more aspie than me?!?  Übereil |
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jan 18, 2010 19:08:50 GMT
Ube - the point of all the weird wording is to tell if you can dig out the actual question from the obfuscation. They ask several duplicate questions, with sneaky rephrasing to see how often you contradict yourself, I suspect. This might relate to the 'perception' stat.
|
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Jan 18, 2010 20:36:18 GMT
Your Aspie score: 143 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 68 of 200 You are very likely an Aspie  Surprise, surprise... |
|
|
|
Post by Hand-E-Food on Jan 18, 2010 22:54:56 GMT
Interesting quiz.  Your Aspie score: 75 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 144 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical  |
|
|
|
Post by The Sonar Chicken on Jan 19, 2010 0:54:50 GMT
Mine: Your Aspie score: 118 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 76 of 200 You are very likely an Aspie  |
|
|
|
Post by Hand-E-Food on Jan 19, 2010 2:27:58 GMT
Mine: Your Aspie score: 118 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 76 of 200 You are very likely an Aspie  Sonar, I changed your ![]() tag. Chaos Cascades doesn't like images that don't end in ".jpg", ".png", or some other common image extension, so I uploaded it to tinypic.com. |
|
|
|
Post by Lews on Jan 19, 2010 5:11:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by fughawzi on Jan 19, 2010 8:57:34 GMT
ehhhh... Your Aspie score: 162 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 43 of 200 You are very likely an Aspie  |
|
|
|
Post by Ubereil on Jan 19, 2010 9:41:31 GMT
This thread proves what I've previously suspected: one out of two pepole on the internet are aspies!!!
Übereil
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jan 19, 2010 14:19:01 GMT
Or that a lot of people don't do so well at tests, Ube...
The results of anything like this are interesting, but hardly proof of anything. Not least because the answers we give are based on our self image, not necessarily on what is really true.
Poor education or comprehension skills could seriously affect the outcome of that test, so it's hardly definitive.
It may be useful as an indicator, but without a professional diagnosis I'd consider it no more than a rather fascinating toy.
|
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Jan 19, 2010 14:29:43 GMT
Simply ask what the "you are very likely an aspie" people put into the beginning under the section that asked "do you think you are an aspie". It had three options: No, Selfdiagnosed and Professionally Diagnosed.
I suppose that that had an influence. And someone that is Pro. Diagnosed, probably just got the obvious result and someone self-diagnosed could have been biased and (unconciously) "tried" to get a high score on the aspie side.
|
|
.com
