Wich file extension are you?

[morbo]

I love .c killerzzz. it is one of my favourite languages.

maybe some positive things of .c

You are the fastest program when compiled
You don't have pompous object that java and other OO languages have. So your easy. You are also low to the ground and every hardware likes you. You are not as high and mighty as those snob languages.
You require perfection since one error and you blow up.
you can become difficult when working with pointers. but pointing is impolite

[Ubereil]

And some negatives on C to weight it up:

* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D (I missed top grade by two points and I dropped six points because I wronte %I instead of %D...).
* It DOESN'T have OO support (whatever Morbo tells you, supporting OO is good. If nothing else, simply because it gives you more options).
* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D.
* A lot of things are uneccesarily complicated (no support for strings for instance).
* Not to mention that it thinks the shortening for Integer is D!

I've been studying C++ for two days, and I'm not looking back! (Well apart from the other class I'm studying is Programming Methodology, were every example is written in C...)

Übereil

[Glance A'Lot]

admin said:

I think Glance needs to redo, too. I really do NOT recognise him from that description!

Well - neither do I - but redoing gives:

"You are .mpg You live life like it was a movie. Constantly in motion, you bring pleasure to many, but are often hidden away."

I must say though that in about a third of the questions I can't relay to any of the potential answers at all.

[Elliot Kane]

glancealot said:

admin said:

I think Glance needs to redo, too. I really do NOT recognise him from that description!

Well - neither do I - but redoing gives:

"You are .mpg You live life like it was a movie. Constantly in motion, you bring pleasure to many, but are often hidden away."

I must say though that in about a third of the questions I can't relay to any of the potential answers at all.

Always a pain when that happens, I think. I've lost count of the number of times I can find no valid answers to various quiz questions.

[Konrad Flameheart]

shantara said:

konrad, move over. you got company.

Now there is an offer

Come join me in *'s corner darling

[Shan]

snigit said:

shantara said:

konrad, move over. you got company.

Now there is an offer

Come join me in *'s corner darling

for a wildcard like you, i'd be happy to join you in the * corner. ;D

[Shan]

ubereil said:

And some negatives on C to weight it up:

* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D (I missed top grade by two points and I dropped six points because I wronte %I instead of %D...).
* It DOESN'T have OO support (whatever Morbo tells you, supporting OO is good. If nothing else, simply because it gives you more options).
* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D.
* A lot of things are uneccesarily complicated (no support for strings for instance).
* Not to mention that it thinks the shortening for Integer is D!

I've been studying C++ for two days, and I'm not looking back! (Well apart from the other class I'm studying is Programming Methodology, were every example is written in C...)

Übereil

sounds like you are having fun, ube.

i have to agree though oop is better. i'll take objects any day.

[morbo]

ubereil said:

* It DOESN'T have OO support (whatever Morbo tells you, supporting OO is good. If nothing else, simply because it gives you more options).

I never said that OO is bad. It is just that C is very low level and doesn't need OO. if you want OO go for java c# C++.

What I mean is when you write a small program (that is more scripting then a program the need for OO doesn't need to be filled.

ubereil said:

* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D.

GET OVER IT!

ubereil said:

* A lot of things are uneccesarily complicated (no support for strings for instance).

sry that you find the true meaning of a string ( an array of characters) confusing.

But that is my point could you ever think of using interfaces in C? It just seam so wrong. If you want OO go for high level languages. It's like saying that Assembly code doesn't have OO. Both languages have there advantages but your argument is like saying my bicycle doesn't have a V8.

(I love java and most of my programming is in java or C#, but for micro controllers I really like C)

[Ubereil]

morbo said:

ubereil said:

* It thinks the shortening for Integer is D.

GET OVER IT!

IT'S TOO DARN ANNOYING!

morbo said:

ubereil said:

* A lot of things are uneccesarily complicated (no support for strings for instance).

sry that you find the true meaning of a string ( an array of characters) confusing.

I didn't say it was confuseing, I said it was unecesarily complicated. Compared to working with strings working with arrays just means a lot of extra work, especially since you can treat a string as an array of characters if you want to. Like a friend of mine said: "I don't know why we learn so much about arrays, once we get strings we're never gonna use arrays ever again." (Note that he meant when working with strings. Arrays can be usefull for other reasons.)

Übereil

[Alrik]

I'm an .EXE, too !

[LaFille]

lol