|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Sept 12, 2008 10:40:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 12, 2008 11:26:46 GMT
Any form of muscular exercise makes you hungrier and the brain is a muscle. So I guess this makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 12, 2008 21:27:44 GMT
Really? I'm surprised. Since most really clever people seem to me are NOT overweight.
Call me a horrible shallow person, but I often dared to connect obesity, especially when it runs in families, with a lower IQ. Simply out of experience...
EDIT: I just re-thought, this is just about thinking, not about IQ, not-as-clever people can still think much. Yeah *thinks loud atm*
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 12, 2008 21:39:53 GMT
Yeah. REALLY clever people tend to be so busy thinking they forget to eat (Which is maybe not so clever after all, but still ;D).
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 12, 2008 22:07:36 GMT
^ Well but I dare to say (oh I overuse the word dare) that people with a higher IQ often also tend to eat healthier due to actually using offered information about a proper diet that we all get daily.
Marilyn vos Savant, the (after the Guinness Book Of Records) person with the Highest IQ alive atm (IQ 220), invented her own diet for example. I know lots of people do that but I found it interesting what she writes about her reasons to eat or not to eat certain thing.
I learned that Einstein also had his very special diet, that didn't seem very healthy afterall but still, he thought about it.
Stephen Hawkings had a personalized dietprogram too.
But to come back to the topic, it was just estimated that thinking makes you fat and if I see how uselessly some people use their ability to think ("Zomgggg did you like, see what Kate Moss wore on that celeb thing? She was sooo skinny in it!"..."If I buy 5 chickenburgers for 1$, I'll get much more then when I take the meal 5 but if I take the special meal that they offer every 7th day of the week....") I'm no surprised at all ^^
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 12, 2008 22:10:04 GMT
Some do, some don't. The one thing that can definitely be said about very clever people is that they are very much individualists.
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 12, 2008 22:12:00 GMT
^ ... and not often fat.
There must be a reason for that. Maybe food just don't occupy such a big part of their lives what I often find is the case with less intelligent people. Higher IQ people doesn't seem to be bored as often.
Buuuut what do I know ^^
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 12, 2008 22:14:15 GMT
Or they find different things to do when bored. But yeah - there ARE people who are both fat and smart, but they are rarer than skinny and smart in my experience.
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 12, 2008 22:21:34 GMT
^ Yes, not saying there arn't any clever Rubens figures, I just wondered before WHY they are rarer. Of course, it is a risky theory to say "clever people are more likely to not be obese". But I do love risky... :bleep: ;D
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 12, 2008 22:22:31 GMT
Like all generalisations, it may not apply to any single individual, yes
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 14, 2008 16:35:43 GMT
"All generalisations are wrong"
|
|
rhiian
Chaosite
One person making something up is a liar, but a bunch of people doing it is Government.
Posts: 661
|
Post by rhiian on Sept 14, 2008 16:49:13 GMT
"69% of statistics are made up on the spot" "is that true?" "I dunno I made it up." ;D going back to kitty's first idea people with a low iq probably spend all their time thinking of food so then they get hungry
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Sept 15, 2008 10:34:43 GMT
How about the fact that people with a higher iq don't need to think as much as a person with a lower iq to solve the same problem?
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Sept 15, 2008 17:49:33 GMT
Yeah, but they also see a lot more possible solutions, DPR, so unless the problem is a simple one that's not always so...
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Sept 15, 2008 23:38:53 GMT
Beware of generalizing the results of any single study--especially if you haven't read the study and subjected it to critical analysis.
1. There were only 14 subjects--a pitifully small sample size. 2. Were the order of the 3 tasks randomized? 3. The conclusions can only be applied to the narrowly defined tasks performed. 4. Etc.
To read stuff like this and file it away in your brain as Truth does science a disservice.
|
|