|
|
Post by peterh on Mar 31, 2010 23:36:08 GMT
Why the hell aren´t we allowed to call people by their appereance anymore?!?
Last weekend I beat up a 70 pound weakling and called him a pussy. That did not sit well with a [Censored] anatomical correct [Censored]who insisted that I refer to the guy as "muscular challenged. Naturally, I decked her as well!
Anatomical correctness - I spit on you!
|
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Mar 31, 2010 23:40:04 GMT
You don't spit on it, you salivate! SALIVATE ON IT, I SAY.
|
|
|
|
Post by peterh on Mar 31, 2010 23:41:54 GMT
They should be soaking in my saliva!
|
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Mar 31, 2010 23:45:10 GMT
I think you're right, but hell, I'mma make it look like I'm arguing anyway
|
|
|
|
Post by killerzzz on Mar 31, 2010 23:48:10 GMT
Then I'll argue too! Arguatingly!
There is no salivation like nasal salivation!
|
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Mar 31, 2010 23:51:35 GMT
Well, I think that is an unfair assumption to make, you have no evidence of that! Everyone knows Ear Saliva is a clear winner!
|
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Mar 31, 2010 23:56:19 GMT
Speaking of anatomical correctness, is it wrong to call a big pregnant woman fat? Or can you just call them round? or to call someone Dumbo cuz he happen to have big ears? Is it inpolite to tell someone he's fugly cuz he has a neck as a bull and a face to chop wood on?
|
|
|
|
Post by peterh on Apr 1, 2010 0:03:00 GMT
A person with big ears should apparantly be called "an extraordinarily good listener" and a pregant women would be better off being called "horisontally challenged"  |
|
|
|
Post by Hand-E-Food on Apr 1, 2010 0:14:25 GMT
Much like this thread being typographical diarrhoea.  |
|
|
|
Post by Hildor on Apr 1, 2010 0:16:01 GMT
Humanity isn't as far as concerned...
|
|
