|
|
Post by Galadriel on Dec 13, 2007 20:43:48 GMT
Last week a couple of visitors at work were arcitects and one of them took a few pics inside the building. Appearently there was one picture that had special attention cause of the composition.
One of the employees send the picture to me, since I'm part of it 
|
|
|
|
Post by ss on Dec 13, 2007 21:22:53 GMT
Which part....??... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Dec 13, 2007 23:16:03 GMT
Yeah. Looks very artistic, I must admit.
|
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Dec 14, 2007 1:14:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Lews on Dec 14, 2007 4:34:01 GMT
interesting picture, artistically.
Cool to see you!
|
|
|
|
Post by killerzzz on Dec 14, 2007 7:12:44 GMT
Gal in action? More like Gal inaction!   Thats cool! You get to be in a peice of art! ;D Killerzzz |
|
|
|
Post by Alrik on Dec 14, 2007 14:26:11 GMT
Looks good, somehow. Movement ... could be the title ... |
|
|
|
Post by rockergrl on Dec 14, 2007 15:43:10 GMT
That's really cool  |
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Dec 14, 2007 20:42:51 GMT
Cool picture |
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Dec 14, 2007 20:44:25 GMT
I had no idea that picture was taken and today I came at work and the picture had been send over mail to everyone, I felt like a Modular celebrity
|
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Dec 15, 2007 5:05:40 GMT
Neat...  But don't they have to get your permission or at least have you to be aware of the fact that you could be photographed for that purpose before publishing something like that with you on it and recognisable? (Where was it published?) |
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Dec 15, 2007 9:27:00 GMT
Neat... But don't they have to get your permission or at least have you to be aware of the fact that you could be photographed for that purpose before publishing something like that with you on it and recognisable? (Where was it published?) |
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Dec 16, 2007 3:54:15 GMT
Lol I don't know; I guess that things like that depend on the context in which the pic was taken and the use that's made of it. I don't know for the rest of the world, but usually when our picture is taken to end up in medias somehow we're asked to sign a model release form; I don't know how much that applies either, though. Demanding for money would maybe make a lot of trouble and animosity for what it's worth, especially if you didn't mind it, but I think it could be in your right and interesting to at least know how it will be used. Who knows, maybe you could even try to have a print of it for yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Dec 16, 2007 3:57:33 GMT
The law - at least in Britain, and it seems in most other places, too - is that you have control over your own image rights unless the press can get you on 'public interest' - which generally means celebrities or other well known persons.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Dec 16, 2007 11:06:29 GMT
I will try to get my hands on the printed version if it gets used. I will get a photoprinted version, but that will be next week. They got more on their minds then thinking of their cleaning lady as a model ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Alrik on Dec 16, 2007 13:50:01 GMT
Put it into a frame, Gal ! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by peterh on Dec 17, 2007 18:12:29 GMT
I had no idea that picture was taken and today I came at work and the picture had been send over mail to everyone, I felt like a Modular celebrity Heh, cool picture, Gal. And, you're certainly going to give BJC a run for his money as the resident celeb on the boards |
|
But don't they have to get your permission or at least have you to be aware of the fact that you could be photographed for that purpose before publishing something like that with you on it and recognisable? (Where was it published?)