|
|
Post by sps1000 on Jan 6, 2006 0:27:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mysterd on Jan 6, 2006 3:02:19 GMT
Intersting. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Jan 6, 2006 12:13:46 GMT
What's the betting that there won't be a PC release due to certian patches that were serriptiously designed for the previous GTA...
|
|
|
|
Post by sps1000 on Jan 6, 2006 15:05:33 GMT
I believe that Rockstar secretly released the patch under a pseudonym. Plus the PC is a third of the market, why loose a third of your business?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Jan 6, 2006 15:58:31 GMT
Hmm, profit?
Seriously, as long as a company can be sued for the actions of other people, then they will not do anything that might get them sued, unless they are fairly sure that they will make more profit than they will be sued for, at which point is just turns into a cost of business.
|
|
|
|
Post by sps1000 on Jan 6, 2006 20:09:48 GMT
Rockstar did loose money from the Hot Coffee scandal, but mainly they got a huge amount of free publicity. They got more free publicity than it cost them.
|
|
