|
|
Post by Terrordar on Mar 14, 2008 11:18:57 GMT
The Incredible Hulk, looks so dreadful, so painfully acted and badly CGed, it makes me want to cry. Ang Lee's Hulk has better affects, and probably a better story. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia3uPDuojmU#Gmo6Ge36__UBe warned, its painful to even watch. They were so cheap they wouldn't even hire a voice coach for Blonsky, meaning he went from Ukrainian, to British... |
|
|
|
Post by hector on Mar 14, 2008 12:16:01 GMT
Feel better?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Mar 14, 2008 12:40:46 GMT
I'm not sure it's possible for any film to actually be worse than Battlefield Earth. And if it is, I hope never to see the result...
|
|
|
|
Post by SPS on Mar 14, 2008 14:29:33 GMT
Incredible Hulk won't be bad it will be a fun movie and good entertainment for two hours but it won't be Iron Man quality.
Oh and there is a movie worse than Battlefield Earth: Freddy Got Fingered. I think that film holds a record for the number of razzies won.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Mar 14, 2008 19:02:04 GMT
Lets see. Bad CG effects. Bad acting. And the SAME PLOT as last time, only removing the father and absorbing man, and replacing it with one of the worst looking abominations ever?
Right. This won't be terrible at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by SPS on Mar 14, 2008 19:48:13 GMT
Bad acting? I have a lot more faith in Edward Norton than that Drath. This guy is a better actor than Bana will ever be. Also I wonder how you can write off the film's acting by just a trailer? They aren't looking to wow you when making a trailer they're looking for money shots. The things that will get you into a theatre and pay your 10-20 bucks.
As for the CGI at least Hulk doesn't look like he went to the All you can eat lard night like he did in Lee's version.
Bad plot? Do I need to remind you of the Hulk dogs? Also the reason why the plot is basically the same how far can you go with the Hulk concept without making him unrecognizable? You can do what Ang Lee did with the movie and make it a personal story or you could give the audience what they want: HULK SMASH!!! If they went to Mr. Fixit, Professor Hulk, or Green Scar Hulk they would alienate a majority of their potential audience. Unfortunately mainstream America will be seeing this of which comic book fans make up about 1% of the audience or less. Unlike Spider-Man where the audience knows about the black costume and all that stuff, Hulk is mainly known by what he was in the TV show, so it's a smart move to stick closer to that than the comic books.
Also as for Abomination do I need to remind you of the Absorbing Man in Hulk? Yeah it worked for the plot that he was Hulk's father but that's about as unfaithful as you can get to the comics. Hulk's father is a demon Bruce has to face himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Mar 14, 2008 23:14:15 GMT
I love Edward Norton, but he's doing this half assed, I can see that. And I'm sorry SPS, but everything you are rattling off does not make me question my view, it honestly makes me go "Erm..." As in "I can't say I'm agreeing." And Lee's hulk did look bulked, because thats how that much muscle would look, and GASP! He was better animated... from FIVE YEARS AGO!  |
|
|
|
Post by hector on Mar 15, 2008 1:02:07 GMT
Judging an entire movie based on a two minute trailer is definitely the smartest things to do. That's how John Byrne does it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Mar 15, 2008 6:37:53 GMT
I've followed this movie actually, listening about the problems its facing (Like Norton being in a big [Censored]UP over how the movie's final cut will be) as well as other things.
So this is more the nail in the coffin for me Hector.
|
|
|
|
Post by hector on Mar 16, 2008 23:41:54 GMT
I've followed this movie actually, listening about the problems its facing (Like Norton being in a big [Censored]UP over how the movie's final cut will be) as well as other things. Edward Norton trying to wrest control of a movie he's in? I'M SHOCKED, SHOCKED BEYOND BELIEF. |
|
