|
|
Post by The Spider on Sept 5, 2009 1:00:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kitty on Sept 5, 2009 4:44:53 GMT
By 6 of them I felt like sueing the owners for making people ill and fat, one looked good (the cheesy one) and two just made me wantto bang my head on the table... $175 for a BURGER? With truffle oil?! Riiiiiight. And the giant one? Looked gross!
But really.. an ice creme burger?!
|
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Sept 5, 2009 18:06:48 GMT
Yuck... That is more stuff to cut the appetite than bring it.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Sonar Chicken on Sept 9, 2009 23:00:17 GMT
Errr... ewww. |
|
|
|
Post by Hildor on Sept 13, 2009 9:10:58 GMT
Well I actually think number 2 looks tasty ;D The rest didn't at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Sept 19, 2009 1:26:30 GMT
Was it a sweet donut? If not yummie! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Hand-E-Food on Sept 19, 2009 23:03:56 GMT
I just had breakfast. I think I'll skip that link.  |
|
|
|
Post by Flix on Sept 19, 2009 23:21:14 GMT
Most of these don't look disgusting to taste, just disgusting to any sense of eating healthy. Like, do I really need grilled cheese sandwiches in place of hamburger buns? #3 and #6 look perfectly normal, just kind of "premium gourmet" quality, #8 just has cheese blended into the meat, and #5 is just big.
I would not touch beef topped with ice cream. They're both good, why not just eat one then the other? I might eat the donut burger though, even if it was sweet. I've had burgers with slightly sweetened buns before and they were delicious.
|
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Sept 20, 2009 0:36:07 GMT
To me, #1 and 8 seem too greasy and don't have an appetizing texture; #2 is just too much stuff, and I can't imagine trying to hold and take a bite of it (I would split that in 3 meals that I could enjoy, however). #3 looks kinda dry/chunky and not easy to eat cleanly, and #4 is just an unappealing mix, as is #6. In #5 the addition of gold leaf and foie gras are turn-offs. Your mileage may vary, of course. ;D
|
|
