|
|
Post by Jackyau on Dec 23, 2009 10:36:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Dec 23, 2009 17:57:41 GMT
Wow, indeed; and spoiled at that, having his own king-size bed. ;D Such giants must be prone to health issues and not have a very long lifespan though, unfortunately...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sonar Chicken on Dec 23, 2009 20:29:00 GMT
What a giant dog!  Hounds of baskerville, anyone?  Also, 110 lbs is... a lot of food. |
|
|
|
Post by Jackyau on Dec 24, 2009 4:25:07 GMT
Yap Certainly a spoiled one. ;D I'm a bit jealously the giant bed lol ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Glance A'Lot on Dec 24, 2009 9:25:30 GMT
Hefty - this dog weighs 1.2 Glance!
Just imaging yourself sitting at a table eating a steak, and this dog standing next to you, hungrily looking DOWN at your plate...
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Dec 24, 2009 9:57:13 GMT
I don't think that dog would be content with a tin or two of Pedigree Chum! ;D
Largest dog I've ever seen. Normally I love dogs, but I'm not sure I wouldn't be at least a little wary of one that size.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hand-E-Food on Dec 24, 2009 12:27:48 GMT
Yeah, I much prefer my lap sized dog.
|
|
|
|
Post by LaFille on Dec 27, 2009 3:10:13 GMT
Most Great Danes I've come across were wussies, though, and puppies aside not very excitable (thankfully). I've heard that they make better apartment dogs than poodles and the like.
When I imagine such dog looking at my plate, I imagine the size of the drool puddle it would make too. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Galadriel on Dec 27, 2009 15:19:51 GMT
Beautiful dog, but a bit too tall for my taste ;D
|
|
Hounds of baskerville, anyone? 
.com
