|
Post by Ubereil on Mar 4, 2007 21:26:22 GMT
Player 2 is actually the person with the 'obvious' advantage, as he gets a win if the hands tie. It's just a mental game - no-one would seriously play poker like that Yeah, it's a mental game, and I am determined Player 2 has a chance no matter what or at least he does in my head. ;D But then again, you don't know anything about poker ;D. (And then again again, with you as player 1 player 2 acually HAVE a big chance ! ) Übereil
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Mar 4, 2007 22:48:04 GMT
But then again, you don't know anything about poker ;D. (And then again again, with you as player 1 player 2 acually HAVE a big chance ! ) Übereil And then again you are right. I don't know anything about poker. ;D I'm still sticking to Player 2. ;D And who knows I might find some way to win no matter what. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Ubereil on Mar 5, 2007 10:24:02 GMT
On player 1's discard phase you pick up a HATCHET and cut his hand off so it looks like he discards his entire hand! ;D Then your Straight Flush 5 to 9 in any colour is unbeatable! Übereil
|
|
|
Post by rossoneri13 on Mar 5, 2007 13:44:31 GMT
logically, a symbol of some kind was visible that had been put there by someone who'd found the cabin before them, and the man recognised it for what it was. Alternitivly it could be an airoplane cabin which crashed into the mountain...you got it
|
|
|
Post by Glance A'Lot on Mar 5, 2007 17:43:07 GMT
logically, a symbol of some kind was visible that had been put there by someone who'd found the cabin before them, and the man recognised it for what it was. Alternitivly it could be an airoplane cabin which crashed into the mountain...you got it hmm - inadequate answer? - two alternatives were proposed! 'You got it' doesn't tell which one you presume correct - unless it's either.
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Mar 5, 2007 18:25:12 GMT
The mark would be certain, the plane almost certain... I'd guess either would do
|
|
|
Post by rossoneri13 on Mar 5, 2007 23:41:11 GMT
hmm - inadequate answer? - two alternatives were proposed! 'You got it' doesn't tell which one you presume correct - unless it's either. sorry i thought i put the correct answer in bold, but i guess i didn't. yah its the plane crash. the cabin was a plane. thats how he knew everyone was dead
|
|
|
Post by Dark Phoenix Rising on Mar 6, 2007 13:49:29 GMT
You're a super-villain and you want to prepare a transparency (the kind that goes on an overhead projector) with the key points of your plan for world domination so you can present them to the hero/superagent before you attempt to kill him in some ridiculously novel way. You don't want this information to fall into the wrong hands before you're ready. Smart villain that you are, you know you can share the information across several slides so that if the enemy agents capture any 2 of your slides, they won't learn even the tiniest bit of information about your plan. How?
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Mar 6, 2007 14:53:42 GMT
Layered slides. You have to pile about a dozen on top of each other to get sense out of it.
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Mar 11, 2007 12:02:46 GMT
What is the only living thing on our planet that the naked eye can see from space?
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Mar 11, 2007 22:43:56 GMT
What is the only living thing on our planet that the naked eye can see from space? It is very very large.
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Mar 11, 2007 22:52:34 GMT
The Great Barrier Reef?
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Mar 12, 2007 0:02:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Mar 12, 2007 0:07:13 GMT
Pick any 3 digit number, such as 592. Now, repeat the number again so that you have a 6 digit number such as 592,592. We will now divide it by 3 successive prime numbers--first 7, then 11, and then 13. The answer will be your original number. Why?
|
|
mobbie
Chaosite
Lalala
Posts: 906
|
Post by mobbie on Mar 12, 2007 1:16:29 GMT
Hell if I know ;D
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Mar 12, 2007 1:48:40 GMT
I'll leave that one to DPR ;D My mind awitches off when I see that kinda thing ;D
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Mar 12, 2007 2:07:03 GMT
Pick any 3 digit number, such as 592. Now, repeat the number again so that you have a 6 digit number such as 592,592. We will now divide it by 3 successive prime numbers--first 7, then 11, and then 13. The answer will be your original number. Why? Because when you take the first 3 numbers and repeat them in the same order for your next 3 numbers, the number will have 7, 11, and 13 as factors. Works for any number 3 set number when it is repeated, because 7, 11, and 13 will always be factors of the final number.
|
|
|
Post by cleglaw on Mar 12, 2007 2:17:44 GMT
Pick any 3 digit number, such as 592. Now, repeat the number again so that you have a 6 digit number such as 592,592. We will now divide it by 3 successive prime numbers--first 7, then 11, and then 13. The answer will be your original number. Why? Because when you take the first 3 numbers and repeat them in the same order for your next 3 numbers, the number will have 7, 11, and 13 as factors. Works for any number 3 set number when it is repeated, because 7, 11, and 13 will always be factors of the final number. And 7x11x13=1001. If you multiply 1001 by any 3 digit number you get the number repeating itself. In other words, writing a 3 digit number twice in a row is the equivalent of multiplying that number by 1001. Congrats to Shan for exploding a myth about women and math.
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Mar 12, 2007 4:58:48 GMT
Yay, me!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by janggut on Mar 14, 2007 0:26:14 GMT
that says a lot about american blondes. ;D it's pretty rare yet wonderful to see Shan showing her mental prowess.
|
|