|
Post by ptsteelers on Jun 4, 2005 15:58:35 GMT
Now see ... Threads like this will probably keep me coming back. Sorry I missed out on this one.
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jun 4, 2005 16:45:27 GMT
Never too late, Perry Let's face it - there's always bound to be philosophical discussion on my board. Nature of the Kane ;D
|
|
|
Post by ptsteelers on Jun 4, 2005 16:48:08 GMT
I hear ya buddy ! Going to post in your "Reality" thread soon ... Time permitting ... have a question/statement
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jun 4, 2005 16:53:13 GMT
Glad to hear it, Perry Thought I'd lost everyone with that one ;D Busy kicking myself for 'Too far, too fast'
|
|
BJC
Apprentice
We Own The Night
Posts: 301
|
Post by BJC on Jun 4, 2005 17:17:00 GMT
Well obiously.... Evolutionists believe we came from a drop of who knows what from the sea. Forming into this that and the other thing. And to most known 'apes to humans'. Wow, we're coming from apes, and the process suddenly stops once the process is subject to being questioned. Idn't that something. "Millions and millions of years will take you from a human to bark on a tree." I'll tell you, if thats the deal.....they can stuff thier macro, in my opinion. ;D What are you talking about? Humans won't evolve into Bark... We'll evolve into another form of homo-(insert title) Either way, we'll end up dumber somehow according to macro evolution. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Jun 4, 2005 17:18:29 GMT
Hi ptsteelers. I noticed that Elliot called you Perry. Is it OK if I call you Perry too or would you prefer Mr. Perry? ;D Even though this thread is as far along as it is, why don't you go ahead and give us your ideas. Nothing wrong with that. Shan
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Jun 4, 2005 17:22:20 GMT
Oh, no, not dumber. If that is the case, I definitely don't believe in macro evolution. We don't need to get any dummer. Shan
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Jun 4, 2005 17:48:24 GMT
Shan, I tend to disagree, our next generation's intelligence may be not only determined by our current diet, their diet, and the circumstances of their birth
|
|
Buffy
Chaosite
Posts: 786
|
Post by Buffy on Jun 4, 2005 18:38:49 GMT
Do we need to? The thing's to ponder our own purpose in life, what WE were made on Earth for, not worry about irrelevant details like how the universe and humankind were created and God's full capabilities which we'll probably never know for sure anyway, and has no real bearing on how we should approach our own lives. I know, I know, you people just like to argue and try to figure these things out. Good luck. I didnt want to argue. Only to express a view. Its when someone claims my point to be [enter any obsenity here]. That i struggle not to react
|
|
Buffy
Chaosite
Posts: 786
|
Post by Buffy on Jun 4, 2005 18:39:53 GMT
Well obiously.... Evolutionists believe we came from a drop of who knows what from the sea. Forming into this that and the other thing. And to most known 'apes to humans'. Wow, we're coming from apes, and the process suddenly stops once the process is subject to being questioned. Idn't that something. "Millions and millions of years will take you from a human to bark on a tree." I'll tell you, if thats the deal.....they can stuff thier macro, in my opinion. ;D What are you talking about? Humans won't evolve into Bark... We'll evolve into another form of homo-(insert title) or just probably a fish. Since we're gonna melt the icecaps...
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jun 4, 2005 18:46:16 GMT
'Homo-Mermanus'
|
|
BJC
Apprentice
We Own The Night
Posts: 301
|
Post by BJC on Jun 4, 2005 18:46:36 GMT
"Billions of years later, if we play our cards right.....we can be a new form of pike....therefor proving evolution is true...." well if evolution is true and we will be pike.....we wont have much to talk about ;D
|
|
|
Post by Elliot Kane on Jun 4, 2005 18:50:20 GMT
The theory of evolution holds that an species will naturally adapt over time to be suited to the conditions in which it lives. If the survival of Humanity as a species is best served by a general decline in intelligence, it will eventually happen. Conversely, if survival requires greater intellectual adaptability that too will happen.
It is a known fact that the rate of scientific advancement accelerates when we are under direct threat. Evolution is simply the long term version of that.
|
|
Buffy
Chaosite
Posts: 786
|
Post by Buffy on Jun 4, 2005 18:54:28 GMT
super intellegent fish? with underground machines?
|
|
|
Post by Duncan on Jun 4, 2005 18:55:23 GMT
At the point in your life when you begin asking yourself these questions, I find this an excellent point at which to introduce yourself to America's finest comic Bill Hicks.
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Jun 4, 2005 23:42:41 GMT
super intellegent fish? with underground machines? The age of fish has already come and gone, as have reptiles, and birds. The odds of them buidling these undergorund machines without the proper digets is unlikely. However super-intelligent fish is a possibility, at this time however, we know of none, and they seem to have no need to evolve, aside from the obvious things, like beat out their predators, adapt to pollution, ect.
|
|
|
Post by Shan on Jun 5, 2005 3:52:59 GMT
Now that could be even worse. I don't think we are the healthiest eating people around. We could be in real trouble or I guess I should say they could be in real trouble. Shan
|
|
Buffy
Chaosite
Posts: 786
|
Post by Buffy on Jun 5, 2005 8:55:55 GMT
super intellegent fish? with underground machines? The age of fish has already come and gone, as have reptiles, and birds. The odds of them buidling these undergorund machines without the proper digets is unlikely. However super-intelligent fish is a possibility, at this time however, we know of none, and they seem to have no need to evolve, aside from the obvious things, like beat out their predators, adapt to pollution, ect. you cant get a joke can u? I was saying WE would be fish! Primarily cause the world will be covered in water. And your theory, in evolution, states that we adapt to our enviroment to live better. Therefore, we become fish
|
|
|
Post by ptsteelers on Jun 5, 2005 12:11:31 GMT
Hi ptsteelers. I noticed that Elliot called you Perry. Is it OK if I call you Perry too or would you prefer Mr. Perry? ;D Actually I prefer "Perry - Lord of the Cosmos (and it's surrounding territory)" But you can shorten it to Perry if you like Even though this thread is as far along as it is, why don't you go ahead and give us your ideas. Nothing wrong with that. Shan Oh perhaps when the Michelob gets flowing, I'll pipe in. I just like to get on the ground floor on discussions such as this.
|
|
|
Post by Terrordar on Jun 5, 2005 14:45:20 GMT
The age of fish has already come and gone, as have reptiles, and birds. The odds of them buidling these undergorund machines without the proper digets is unlikely. However super-intelligent fish is a possibility, at this time however, we know of none, and they seem to have no need to evolve, aside from the obvious things, like beat out their predators, adapt to pollution, ect. you cant get a joke can u? I was saying WE would be fish! Primarily cause the world will be covered in water. And your theory, in evolution, states that we adapt to our enviroment to live better. Therefore, we become fish Hah! But mammals HAVE done that, and some of the most intelligent animals on earth live in the oceans. Mammals left land and evolved into whales and Dolphins, and dolphins are the second smartest animal on earth. There is still land on earth, lots of it, and that would explain why man has yet to go to the ocean depths to live. However, mammals have evolved to go into the ocean, and are immensely intelligent.
|
|